I’m working on a little basket widget, and while thinking about the
model I caught myself unsure about how to handle validation errors. For
example: while instantiating a new Product
, I need its ID, name and
price, but what should I do when price is not a number?
I realize that I have very little experience with error throwing, and I don’t have a “usual” way. So, to throw or not to throw?
If I don’t throw, I would have to somehow fill in for the invalid values, which implies making some decisions. For example: what should I set the price to when it’s not valid? Maybe I can leave it undefined? Or null? This doesn’t smell right at all. Maybe I could pick the closest value: zero. But this would mean to paper over the fact that the input value was not good, and can lead me into some confusing situations.
If I throw, I would have to account for that in the client code. This makes the a bit more code noisy, but, at least is explicit; and there will be one less source of NPEs.
OK, so I will throw. Im guessing the I’d get the best ROI from it if I’ll do it early in the process. The earlier I pass through the potentially throwing code, the earlier I get to “solid ground” where I can stop worrying about invalid values.
One such place is when loading the page, I will check if there is a persisted data, and try to restore the basket content from it.
Whichever the persistence method, it’s outside of my code and I can’t guarantee that the persisted data is perfectly valid, so the Basket model initialization the is the earliest — and so the best — possible moment. Rejecting the invalid data at the boundary of the system minimizes the effort to deal with it: I’ll need less checking, less error handling, which means more straight-forward code, and hopefully less bugs.
Sounds good.