In a previous post I said that I recently went to a JS meet up, and I was left with the impression that the presentations would have been more useful if they were more narrowly focused: maybe take a specific problem and explain how a particular framework helps in solving it. Then I thought, what exactly do I mean by that? So here is what.

Population/collection of large forms¹

So, in my side project, I have a large form. Even more than that: depending on the choices that users makes at some point, there may be more fields added at the subsequent steps. With jQuery, you have to write code that:

  • finds those fields and populates them when you open the document
  • finds those fields and collects data out of them into a structure to save

Yes, you can come up with clever conventions and tricks to make this nicer, I’ve tried that, an my version was not that nice in the end. :-/

With Angular’s binding, you just add the ng-model attribute on inputs, and you have all the data, all the time, in and out of the form, with zero DOM walking. B-)

¹ I know large forms are a subject in and of themselves, but let’s say for a moment that in my particular context this was OK. ;)


What I mean by this fancy word is that you can easily figure out what HTML element has what logic bound to it, usually just by looking at its attributes in the markup, most of the time this is about directives, controllers, form validation rules, and filters. With jQuery it’s pretty easy to mess up by moving the element into the DOM tree or changing its class, ID or attributes, which in both cases means the element’s selector changes.


This is in part about the previous fancy-word one, just from the perspective of how it makes “componentization” (another invented fancy word) of the UI easier by allowing you bind the structure/markup and the behavior/JS code in a nice way.

The first point was enough for me to take a closer look at Angular, and I was thrilled to find about the second two. I will talk about other its goodies in another post.